Comparison with the Straits Sett., we answered that in desp. on 765306 different by pointing out that the question was originally raised in a manner at variance, viz. by the Roman Catholics demanding that Concurrent Endowment... I think that fact cannot be overlooked in connection with the circumstance that the R. C. Bishop has signed the present Memorial.
are from 6 to 10 times Aj Nuank koy an the Argh granted he and the would doubtless renew his request.
for Protestan Dissenter are about concurrent Endowment hereafter, numerem
As to par. 2 I do not admit that clergyman paid out of public funds is required necessarily for any of purposes specified, except for attendance on the Sick at in Hospital, & that has already been conceded (see below) par. 3. It has been decided to pay for English Church Clergyman's ministrations in the Gaol paid I Hospital at some rate as is now to a Similar R. C. Priest [16936/04] $720/2.0.
par. 4. I think we may take M. Ho Kai, as a truer representative of Chinese feeling on this subject than the unknown Chinese who sign This Memorial; and M. Ho Kai spoke against the Endowment of one religious denomination at the expense of the general taxpayer in Dec. last [see red marked speech in the Daily Press of 2nd Dec.].
In Chinese only Enjoy the advantages referred to in comm with other inhabitants of the colony.
parr. 6-8. The Congregation at the Presbyterian Church are of the same class, & they are able to support a Minister.
par. 9 This par. (which the "China Mail" calls "screechings, funny,") sounds to me like rather a confession of weakness; it can hardly be treated as a serious argument.
parr. 10-12 The cost and expense involved I said above be $78720 for services at Gaol & Hospital. The Govt need not provide for burials, of paupers. will as I except in case
parr. 13, 14 There is no evidence whatever that the community is almost unanimous in favour of the continuance of the Endowment.
On the contrary, the representative in the Council of the Chinese community has opposed it and two of the three English newspapers are opposed to it.
!
;
Comparison with the Straits Sett., we answered that in
desp. on
765306
different
by pointing out that the question was originably raised in a manner at Hauptuny, viz. by then Roman Catholics demanding that
Concurrent Endowment
ing-think
W da ju jsme that fact cannot be overlooked in c
Ilu Remnan
nection Catholic
with the circumstance that the
R. C. Bishop has signed the prevent sus of this were Memmal
ㄡˇ
are
from d
to 10 times
Aj Nuank koy
an
the Argh
granted he and the
would doubtless renew his request.
for
Protestan Dissenter are about
concurrent Endowment hereafter, numerem
As to par. 2 Ido not admit that
clergyman paid out of public funds
is required necessarily for any of purposes specified, except for attendance on the Sick at in Hospital, & that has already been conceded (see below) par. 3. It has been decided to pay for English Church
Clergyman's ministrations in the Gaol
paid I Hospital at some rate as is now
to
a
Similar
R. C. She Priest [16936/04] $720/2.0.
" par. 4. I think we may
M.L.C., as a
take M. Ho Kai,
truer representative of
Chinese feeling
[
this subject than the
40 unknown presso Chinese who sign This Memorial; and WW. Ho kai spoke against the Endowment of one religions denomination
as the Augh
Одесу
at the expense of the general taxpayer in Dec. last [see red marked speech in thay Daily Press of 2nd Dec . ]
In (liniese only Enjoy the 636 par. 5
advantages referred to in comm with other inhabitants of the foley.
parr. 6-8. The Congregation at the Presbyterian (hurch
the same
ane
Jexactl
class, & get they areable to support a Minister.
par. 9
This par. (which the Jhina
opapil "Mail" "calls" "screechings, funny," ")
sounds to me
like
A
rather
confessio of weakness; it
a serious argument. can hardl be treated as a serious parr. 10-12 The and expense involved
I said above be 78720 for services at faol & Hospital. The So need not provide for burials,
of paupers.
will as
شما
I except in case
parr. 13, 14 There is no widence whatever that the community in "almost unanimous in favou the continuance I
thee Endowment.
On the contrary, the representative in the Council of the Chinese communit
to and has oppored
i
t of the three English newspapers are opposed issues farand
umpind kan perasangan)
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.